Implementing the 2016 business plan and continuing to connect and develop the agent system, the MKT department planned the first overseas business trip of 2016, attending the Annual Meeting of the PGA Association and visit several dealers based in Bangkok.
As a member of PGA since 2012, this is the first time Glotrans has participated in the Association's Annual Meeting. With a limited number of members, the Conference was held on a small scale, with nearly 40 people from more than 20 participating members. This is the difference compared to some other medium-sized conferences (CLC & TFS, WCA, PPL...)
At the Conference, Business Development Director - Ms. Tracy, gave a presentation to introduce Glotrans with outstanding services, strengths in the system of offices as well as some of the major projects that the company is implementing. This is the difference of the PGA Conference compared to other Association Conferences when each member participating for the first time will have the opportunity to introduce directly to all other members within the framework of the Conference.
.jpg)
During the 1-to-1 meetings, Ms. Hau once again emphasized the advantages and differences of Glotrans compared to other forwarding companies in the Vietnamese market.
The biggest purpose of 1-to-1 meetings is to establish relationships with agents, maintain regular contact and create circles with members of the association, not passively waiting for new goods to be sold. physical. Besides, Ms. Tracy also affirmed that Glotrans always appreciates the support of agents and wishes to connect to create a strong network system to provide a variety of services to customers.
Participating in the Conference and meeting with agents left a good impression on agents about a dynamic, proactive and open Glotrans. It is hoped that these strategic-oriented overseas business trips will soon yield the expected results.
Outside the United States, global demand for Chinese products is hitting new highs. Despite being a major target of U.S. tariffs, China has strengthened its trade relationships across Africa, Southeast Asia, and Europe in 2025. While China cements its role as a global export leader, the U.S. is increasingly shifting its focus toward self-reliance.
The “China +1” strategy, once seen as a temporary plan to diversify production outside of China, has now evolved into a long-term restructuring of global supply chains. Increasingly
Vietnamese food and spice producers are making steady progress in international markets by focusing on “real quality.” By combining authentic local flavors with strict international certifications, they are strengthening their competitiveness and building trust among global buyers.
Recently, Glotrans Vietnam once again affirmed its capability in the field of Project Cargo transportation by successfully completing a special shipment from Shanghai, China to Cat Lai Port, Ho Chi Minh City.
In the joyful spirit of celebrating Vietnamese Women’s Day on October 20th, Glotrans Vietnam organized a warm and intimate ceremony to express appreciation to all female staff across the system. The event was a heartfelt thank-you to the wonderful women – the “flowers” who contribute to the success and unity of the Glotrans family.
Recently, Glotrans Vietnam organized a warm and joyful birthday celebration for employees born in October across all branches and offices nationwide.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
Company Q (Plaintiff – the Insured) and Company B (Defendant – the Insurer) entered into an insurance contract. After an insured event occurred, the parties could not agree on the value of the loss and therefore conducted an assessment. The unilateral assessment conducted by the Insurer was not accepted, while the independent assessment was only partially recognized.
