GLOTRANS PARTICIPATES IN THE WORKSHOP "DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTICS OF VIETNAM - CHINA ECONOMIC CORRECTION"

On February 19, Deputy Director of Glotrans Hai Phong - Ms. Bui Thi Minh Hang represented the business participation in the meeting between the city. Hai Phong, along with the Executive Board, businesses in the HPLA Association with the Department of Trade and Enterprises of Yunnan China Province on promoting the development of the Vietnam -China economic corridor at Hai Phong City Convention Center.

In the situation of transportation demand through Lao Cai border gate to Hai Phong port and vice versa with a volume of up to 2 million tons/year but with existing transport capacity, only 20%- 25% of love The bridge set out, Hai Phong and Yunnan China province held a meeting to promote the development of logistics routes of Con Minh - Lao Cai - Hanoi - Hai Phong - Quang Ninh economic corridor.


The meeting opened up new orientations, helping businesses access the needs of the logistics market at the moment. To grasp the market trend well, Glotrans is always updated with information and ready to prepare to move the trends.

Related News

Digital Logistics Transformation: A New Competitive Capability for SMEs

For many years, logistics was viewed primarily as a back-end support function. Today, amid increasing global trade volatility, logistics has become a strategic factor directly influencing business growth, risk management capability, and long-term competitiveness.

Global Supply Chains Shift to Vietnam: Opportunities and Strategic Implications for 2026

Amid ongoing global supply chain restructuring, Vietnam is emerging as a key manufacturing and sourcing hub in Asia. The “China+1” strategy and the need for risk diversification are driving multinational corporations to expand their presence in Vietnam.

Logistics Market Report – April 2026: The Singapore Bottleneck, Hormuz Risks, and Strategic Implications for Vietnam’s Trade

Entering April 2026, escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz have triggered a systemic disruption across global logistics networks. However, for Vietnamese import-export enterprises, the immediate risk is no longer confined to the Middle East. The critical pressure point has shifted to Asia’s transshipment hubs-most notably Singapore-where congestion is now constraining regional cargo flows at scale.

Related News

HOLIDAY NOTICE – HUNG KINGS’ COMMEMORATION DAY & REUNIFICATION DAY (30/4) – INTERNATIONAL LABOR DAY (1/5) 2026

Glotrans would like to inform our valued Customers and Partners of our upcoming holiday schedule as follows:

HAPPY 5TH ANNIVERSARY OF GLOTRANS QUY NHON (April 23, 2021 – April 23, 2026)

April 23, 2026 marks the 5-year milestone of establishment and development of Glotrans – Quy Nhon Branch. Though the journey is not long, it is enough to affirm the resilience, dedication, and strong growth spirit of a young, dynamic, and promising team.

CROSS-BORDER PROJECT CARGO TRANSPORTATION | DOOR-TO-DOOR (Pingxiang – Huu Nghi – Quang Tri)

Glotrans has successfully completed a cross-border Door-to-Door transportation project, connecting China to Central Vietnam, involving a fleet of 9 trailer trucks, ensuring schedule compliance and safety throughout the entire journey.

Related News

DISPUTE OVER THE SHIPMENT OF ENZYMES IMPORTED FROM INDIA

The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.

The Insured’s Duty to Prevent and Mitigate Losses

Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.

Insurance Contracts Do Not Automatically Terminate Due to Late Premium Payment

Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.