Warning for An imposture of Glotrans’s information

Dear Valued Customers,

Global Logistics and Transport Limited
Company (also known as Glotrans) have recently received feedback from customers about scammers impostering Glotrans Company.
Those imposter companies may take the same name and address to our Company, but different representatives and phone numbers, or the same name with different addresses, different accounts… Those imposter
companies usually deal with customers via purchasing booths on the COSTCO e-commerce plat form, and requiring customers to transfer money to several accounts for the purpose of illegal appropriation.
To protect the rights and benefits of our valued customers as well as prevent from fraudulent acts as above mentioned, Glotrans would like to announce that:
Firstly, Glotrans does not have any transactions or cooperation with COSTCO. Secondly, Glotrans shall not be responsible for any transactions of companies illegally impostering Glotrans.
Finally, Glotrans publicizes all information on our website at www.glotransvn.com.vn. All of transactions, documents that are inappropriate with the information we provide are fraud.
We would like to respectfully inform you, and wish you good health and success!

Related News

PANAMA CANAL TO FURTHER REDUCE DRAFT LIMIT FOR NEOPANAMAX VESSELS

The Panama Canal will further reduce the maximum allowable draft for Neopanamax vessels from late August 2026 as water levels in Gatun Lake continue to decline.

DELAY INSURANCE: WHEN TIME BECOMES A MEASURABLE RISK

In modern logistics, delays are no longer viewed as mere inconveniences. They can result in significant financial losses, including reduced revenue, dissatisfied customers, increased warehousing costs, disrupted production schedules, and damaged business reputation

GLOTRANS SHOWCASES INTERGRATED LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS AT MTA VIETNAM 2026

From July 1–4, 2026, Glotrans is participating in MTA Vietnam 2026, one of Vietnam's leading international exhibitions for precision engineering, manufacturing, and supporting industries, held at the Saigon Exhibition and Convention Center (SECC), Ho Chi Minh City.

Related News

GLOTRANS – HANDS-ON LEADERSHIP, GROWING TOGETHER WITH OUR TEAM

Over the past few days, GLOTRANS’s General Director has been traveling between offices, from Da Nang to Quy Nhon, to personally attend meetings reviewing the business performance of the first six months of the year, assess each office’s operations, and work with the teams to set goals for the next stage.

GLOTRANS NATIONAL DAY HOLIDAY ANNOUNCEMENT 2/9/2026

GLOTRANS would like to inform our Valued Customers and Partners of our holiday schedule for Vietnam’s National Day (2 September 2026) as follows:

GLOTRANS 17 YEARS – PROUD OF OUR JOURNEY, MOVING FORWARD TO GREATER HORIZONS 15 August 2009 – 15 August 2026

A memorable milestone was celebrated by GLOTRANS and our valued colleagues, customers, and partners at a special event marking 17 years of GLOTRANS Vietnam – a journey built on dedication, resilience, connectivity, and a continuous drive for growth.

Related News

DISPUTE OVER THE SHIPMENT OF ENZYMES IMPORTED FROM INDIA

The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.

The Insured’s Duty to Prevent and Mitigate Losses

Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.

Insurance Contracts Do Not Automatically Terminate Due to Late Premium Payment

Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.