On the occasion of the Lunar New Year, as spring approaches, this is also a meaningful time for Glotrans HCM to look back on the journey we have gone through and to express our sincere appreciation for the dedication and contributions of all employees who have worked tirelessly for the development of the branch. Glotrans HCM successfully held the Year End Party 2025 with the attendance of the Board of Directors and all staff of the Ho Chi Minh City branch.
It can be said that 2025 was a year full of challenges and difficulties for Glotrans HCM. However, with the right direction from the Board of Management and the strong efforts of the entire team, Glotrans HCM achieved many remarkable and proud accomplishments. These achievements are reflected in the growth of our customer base, the diversification of services offered to the market, and the enhanced capability to handle complex shipments and projects requiring optimal logistics solutions to meet our customers’ demands.
Throughout the program, in addition to reviewing the key achievements and areas for improvement in 2025, the young and dynamic Glotrans HCM team contributed to an energetic and vibrant atmosphere through engaging cultural and entertainment performances. These performances were meaningful gifts from each department to our distinguished guests, the Board of Directors, and all participants.
We would like to extend our sincere thanks to the Organizing Committee of YEP 2025 HCM, as well as to the Board of Directors and Management for creating favorable conditions to deliver such a successful event. Special thanks to all employees who not only devoted themselves to their work but also enthusiastically participated in the program. We hope this event will serve as a strong motivation for us to reflect, improve, and continue developing together, moving confidently toward a successful and prosperous year 2026.
As sustainability continues to gain importance across global business operations, Green Procurement is becoming a key consideration in sourcing strategies and supply chain management
Recent developments in the Middle East continue to have a significant impact on the global logistics industry. The ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz, combined with prolonged regional instability, is driving up transportation costs, affecting carrier operations, and placing additional strain on international supply chains.
For many years, logistics was viewed primarily as a back-end support function. Today, amid increasing global trade volatility, logistics has become a strategic factor directly influencing business growth, risk management capability, and long-term competitiveness.
As our Team Building journey in Phu Yen comes to a close, what remains is not only beautiful photos or joyful moments, but a stronger team spirit than ever before.
Our Team Building 2026 journey in Ninh Binh has come to a successful close, leaving us with meaningful memories, stronger connections, and renewed energy for the road ahead.
On the occasion of International Children’s Day (June 1st), GLOTRANS offices and branches nationwide simultaneously organized a meaningful gift-giving program for the children of employees currently working at the Company.
The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
