On February 13, President of USA's Donald Trump signed a new executive order on tariffs, marking a decisive step in reshaping U.S. trade policy. This order aims to increase import tariffs on trade partners with significant trade surpluses with the U.S., including Vietnam.
The "Reciprocal Trade and Tariff Order" issued by President Trump introduces several key aspects. The U.S. government will conduct a review of over 17,000 imported product codes to adjust tariff rates for each country and product, ensuring that the tariffs imposed by the U.S. reflect parity with the tariffs these countries apply to American goods. A notable point in the executive order is its emphasis on the principle of reciprocal tariffs—if a country imposes high duties on U.S. goods while benefiting from lower tariffs when exporting to the U.S., Washington will raise tariffs to restore balance.
Among the countries with substantial trade surpluses with the U.S., Vietnam is significantly affected, ranking just behind China and Mexico. The trade surplus between Vietnam and the U.S. reached $105 billion in 2023, making Vietnam one of the largest exporters to the American market
The new U.S. tariffs could pose considerable challenges for Vietnamese businesses. Higher export costs may reduce the competitiveness of Vietnamese goods in the U.S. market. Additionally, there is a growing risk of anti-circumvention investigations, as the U.S. has previously accused certain foreign enterprises of using Vietnam as a transshipment point for Chinese goods to evade tariffs.
President Trump’s reciprocal tariff policy could significantly reshape the global trade landscape. For Vietnam, it presents a major challenge but also an opportunity to adjust trade and investment strategies in response to U.S. policy shifts. Proactively negotiating, strengthening domestic industries, and diversifying export markets will be crucial solutions for Vietnam to protect its trade interests and sustain long-term economic growth.
Source: collect
In modern logistics, delays are no longer viewed as mere inconveniences. They can result in significant financial losses, including reduced revenue, dissatisfied customers, increased warehousing costs, disrupted production schedules, and damaged business reputation
From July 1–4, 2026, Glotrans is participating in MTA Vietnam 2026, one of Vietnam's leading international exhibitions for precision engineering, manufacturing, and supporting industries, held at the Saigon Exhibition and Convention Center (SECC), Ho Chi Minh City.
As sustainability continues to gain importance across global business operations, Green Procurement is becoming a key consideration in sourcing strategies and supply chain management
On August 1, 2026, Glotrans Da Nang had the honor of participating in the 2nd Da Nang Business Connecting Day – 2026, organized by the Da Nang Young Entrepreneurs Association at Muong Thanh Grand Quang Nam Hotel
Recently, Glotrans participated in the Vietnam International Logistics Exhibition (VILOG 2026), held at the Saigon Exhibition and Convention Center (SECC) in Ho Chi Minh City.
With nearly two decades of establishment and development, Glotrans has always believed that people are the foundation of a company’s sustainable strength. Therefore, team bonding journeys are valuable opportunities for employees to connect, share, and recharge for the road ahead.
The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
