Maersk-owned global port and terminal operator APM Terminals and Aqaba Development Cooperation signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for a 15-year extension of their partnership in the Aqaba Container Terminal (ACT) in Jordan.
According to the deal signed last week, the two partners will invest US$242 million in the box terminal to maintain its strong position in the Levant region and accelerate net zero plans of ACT.
At a forum following the signing, Keith Svendsen, CEO of APM Terminals, introduced the key aspects of the company’s future vision for the Aqaba port, which include decarbonisation plans, the modernisation and expansion of ACT, the development of a training center for individuals working in the maritime and logistics sectors, and ongoing support for Jordan's goal of becoming an export hub for green energy.
“To reinforce our long-term commitment to Aqaba and to Jordan’s 2030 Economic Modernization Vision, we have developed a meticulous plan for enhancing Aqaba’s competitiveness both regionally and globally including a net zero emission target for 2040 - the only port in the region with such,” he said.
According to a recent announcement, on-site solar will completely eliminate the terminal’s carbon footprint and the zero-carbon terminal will become the heart of Aqaba’s future logistics eco system.
In addition, relocating customs closer to the port is expected to optimise clearance processes and directly connect to Aqaba Logistics Village where increasing trade opportunities will reach the wider economy.
"Bringing together agents and shippers will also ensure faster goods distribution," pointed out APM Terminals.
APM Terminals also aims to develop a Centre of Excellence for the logistics and maritime industry, which will improve the skills of the sector’s current and future professionals.
As global supply chains navigate ongoing shifts, expanding a robust international partner network is a vital strategy for ensuring seamless cargo flows. From April 1st to 4th, 2026, Glotrans Vietnam is officially taking part in the 21st JCtrans Global Freight Forwarders Conference, held at the Queen Sirikit National Convention Center (QSNCC) in Bangkok, Thailand.
The 15th WCA Worldwide Conference 2026, organized from 9 to 13 March in Singapore, successfully brought together freight forwarding and logistics companies from across the globe. Hosted in one of Asia’s leading logistics hubs, the conference attracted thousands of freight forwarders, logistics enterprises, and supply chain professionals from many countries worldwide.
Air cargo is heating up again in a very concrete way: speed is no longer just a company advantage—it is increasingly a national advantage. IATA recorded strong global air cargo growth and a record year in 2024, and in 2025 several months continued to set new highs in demand measured by CTK, suggesting this is not a short-lived surge.
Attending the Thanh Hoa Investment Promotion Conference 2026 for the first time, Glotrans’ representatives not only sought networking opportunities but also gained deeper insights into how Thanh Hoa is gradually repositioning its role within the regional supply chain landscape.
On the morning of March 25, 2026, Glotrans Vietnam – Hai Phong Branch organized a talkshow at the Faculty of Economics, Vietnam Maritime University under the theme “Glotrans & Career Compass.”
On March 23, Glotrans had the honor of partnering with CMC University in a talkshow themed: “From Campus to Market – Decoding Career Opportunities in Logistics Sales.”
The shipment of food additives was transported in container No. FCIU3301688 (20’), under B/L MPRSMUM1806, on the voyage from Nhavasheva Port (India) to Dinh Vu Port (Hai Phong, Vietnam) on 29/04/2017.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
