The University of Economics and its partners agree to deepen cooperation in all three areas, that is, improving training programs, connecting practice centers and expanding job opportunities for students. content in the cooperation agreement signed between the University and the Valoma Training and Technology Transfer Consultancy Center (Valocene) and Global Transport and Logistics Co., Ltd. The cooperation agreement was signed on the morning of December 22 at the University of Economics - the University of Danang.
The signing ceremony was attended by leaders of the partners including: Mr. Duong Quang Khanh - General Secretary of Vietnam Logistics Human Resources Development Association (VALOMA), Ms. Cao Cam Linh - Head of VALOMA Research Department, Mr. Hoang Van Chung – Director of Valoma Consulting and Technology Transfer Center (Valocene), Mr. Duong Tien Lam – Representative of Vietnam Logistics Service Enterprise Association (VLA) in Da Nang; On the business side, there were the attendance of Mr. To Van Hiep - Chairman of Da Nang Road Freight Association - Director of Green Lien Chieu Logistics Joint Stock Company, Ms. Nguyen Thi My Hien - Deputy Director of the branch. in Da Nang of Global Transport and Logistics Co., Ltd., Mr. Nguyen Van Dong - Representative of EcoTruck Technology Joint Stock Company, representative of "Pigeon Logistics Co., Ltd" and "Con Bee Logistics Joint Stock Company". On the side of the University of Economics, there were Assoc.Prof.Dr. Le Van Huy – Vice Rector of the University, Prof. Dr. Nguyen Truong Son – Dean of Faculty of Business Administration, Dr. Dang Huu Man – Head of Science & International Cooperation Department and teachers from Faculty of Business Administration.
Speaking at the signing ceremony, Assoc.Prof.Dr. Le Van Huy highly appreciates the participation and advice of associations and businesses in adjusting, giving suggestions and improving the quality of training programs. This is the basis for students to access and update new knowledge of the subjects, and at the same time grasp information about the industry, job opportunities and recruitment trends of businesses. The cooperation agreement is a particularly important event, marking a new milestone in the cooperation relationship between the University and the enterprise. From the cooperation agreement, the University of Economics will continue to be a bridge for businesses to recruit high-quality human resources, and at the same time create many internship, practice and job opportunities for students after graduation
Representative of University of Economics and Valoma Center for Training and Technology Transfer (Valoma) – Mr. Hoang Van Chung (Director) signed a memorandum of understanding including cooperation contents including: building training programs, cooperation in teaching short and long-term training programs, building logistics simulation software, internship practice center, business association for internship programs, building exchange centers change lecturers between schools in the area; building a labor demand data center, organizing job promotion events for students
As the chair of the seminar, the Faculty of Business Administration has received comments and suggestions from businesses, related associations and alumni to improve the quality of teaching and learning. Since then, the faculty has continued to review and adjust training programs, renovate teaching contents and methods as well as improve graduate internship activities in the direction of focusing on developing professional skills and skills. soft for learners.
Outside the United States, global demand for Chinese products is hitting new highs. Despite being a major target of U.S. tariffs, China has strengthened its trade relationships across Africa, Southeast Asia, and Europe in 2025. While China cements its role as a global export leader, the U.S. is increasingly shifting its focus toward self-reliance.
The “China +1” strategy, once seen as a temporary plan to diversify production outside of China, has now evolved into a long-term restructuring of global supply chains. Increasingly
Vietnamese food and spice producers are making steady progress in international markets by focusing on “real quality.” By combining authentic local flavors with strict international certifications, they are strengthening their competitiveness and building trust among global buyers.
Recently, Glotrans Vietnam once again affirmed its capability in the field of Project Cargo transportation by successfully completing a special shipment from Shanghai, China to Cat Lai Port, Ho Chi Minh City.
In the joyful spirit of celebrating Vietnamese Women’s Day on October 20th, Glotrans Vietnam organized a warm and intimate ceremony to express appreciation to all female staff across the system. The event was a heartfelt thank-you to the wonderful women – the “flowers” who contribute to the success and unity of the Glotrans family.
Recently, Glotrans Vietnam organized a warm and joyful birthday celebration for employees born in October across all branches and offices nationwide.
Company T (Plaintiff – the Insured) entered into an insurance contract with Company B (Defendant – the Insurer). After the insured event occurred, the Insurer alleged that the Insured had violated its obligation to prevent and mitigate losses. The Arbitral Tribunal acknowledged that such an obligation exists but concluded that the Insured did not breach it.
Under the insurance contract, the premium was to be paid in three installments, and in all three, the insured party was late in payment. When a dispute arose, the insurer (Defendant) argued that the insurance contract had terminated before the insured event occurred due to the late premium payment and therefore refused to make an insurance payout. However, the Arbitral Tribunal held a contrary view.
Company Q (Plaintiff – the Insured) and Company B (Defendant – the Insurer) entered into an insurance contract. After an insured event occurred, the parties could not agree on the value of the loss and therefore conducted an assessment. The unilateral assessment conducted by the Insurer was not accepted, while the independent assessment was only partially recognized.
